Abstract:Martin Ravallion and Nanak Kakwani have reopened a debate in which they have been engaged for some time. I find myself in agreement with both – not with their definitions of pro-poor growth, but with their criticisms of each other. That is to say, I find both their definitions problematic. (...)
Keywords:Poverty, pro-poor
Publication Date:
Type/Issue:One Pager/9
ISSN:1812-108x
You can also download in other languages:
