Resumo:Martin Ravallion and Nanak Kakwani have reopened a debate in which they have been engaged for some time. I find myself in agreement with both – not with their definitions of pro-poor growth, but with their criticisms of each other. That is to say, I find both their definitions problematic. (...)

Palavras-chave:Poverty, pro-poor

Data de publicação:03 Janeiro, 2005

Tipo/Issue:One Pager/9

ISSN:1812-108x